Old Wives' Tales
Radio & TV
Toxin du jour
Claim: A 1967 news article reported terrorist efforts to disrupt elections in South Vietnam.
Example: [Collected on the Internet, 2005]
Origins: Usually when someone quotes a decades-old news story that appears to have particularly detailed relevance to a current political issue, the article is not a genuine old news item but a piece of modern satire. (Click here and here for two recent examples of this phenomenon.) Thus one might well expect a 37-year-old article about terrorists attempting to disrupt elections in a foreign country where the U.S. was involved in a large-scale military action (mirroring the current situation in Iraq) to be a spoof, but in this case it's the real McCoy.
On 4 September 1967, the New York Times published two articles about Vietcong terrorists attempting to disrupt elections in South Vietnam, headlined "U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote" and "Terrorists Kill 26 During Voting." The first few paragraphs of the former are quoted above. The rest of the article reads as follows:
Pending more detailed reports, neither the State Department nor the White House would comment on the balloting or the victory of the military candidates, Lieut. Gen. Nguyen Van Thieu, who was running for president, and Premier Nguyen Cao Ky, the candidate for vice president.In a front-page article that same day, the New York Times reported that the Vietcong had launched a series of terrorist attacks throughout South Vietnam just before and during the election that left
A successful election has long been seen as the keystone in President Johnson's policy of encouraging the growth of constitutional processes in South Vietnam. The election was the culmination of a constitutional development that began in January, 1966, to which President Johnson gave his personal commitment when he met
The purpose of the voting was to give legitimacy to the Saigon Government, which has been founded only on coups and power plays since November, 1963, when President Ngo Dinh Diem was overthrown by a military junta.
Few members of that junta are still around, most having been ousted or exiled in subsequent shifts of power.
Significance Not Diminished
The fact that the backing of the electorate has gone to the generals who have ruling South Vietnam for the last two years does not, in the Administration's view, diminish the significance of the constitutional step that has been taken.
The hope here is that the new government will be able to maneuver with a confidence and legitimacy long lacking in South Vietnamese politics. That hope could have been dashed either by a small turnout, indicating widespread scorn or a lack of interest in constitutional development, or by the Vietcong's disruption of the balloting.
American officials had hoped for an 80 per cent turnout. That was the figure in the election in September for the Constitutional Assembly. Seventy-eight per cent of the registered voters went to the polls in elections for local officials last spring.
Before the results of the presidential election started to come in, the American officials warned that the turnout might be less than
Captured documents and interrogations indicated in the last week a serious concern among Vietcong leaders that a major effort would be required to render the election meaningless. This effort has not succeeded, judging from the reports from Saigon.
Last updated: 1 February 2005
This material may not be reproduced without permission.
snopes and the snopes.com logo are registered service marks of snopes.com.